The Question
Should you create a new category or position in an existing one?
Should you invest in creating a new market category (defining the game), or should you position brilliantly within an existing one (winning the game)?
The 4 Positions
Evidence from the Archive
Otis: became the category queen of elevators by reframing the problem, not just building a better product
Purell: created the 'hand sanitizer' category by framing the question 'How do I wash my hands in the absence of water?'
Google vs. Yahoo: product-market fit as substitution, satisfying the search need in a fundamentally novel way
Netflix vs. Blockbuster: Netflix's streaming model counter-positioned against Blockbuster's store-based model -- Blockbuster could not cannibalize store revenue and late fees to respond
Salesforce: Benioff declared 'software is over' and the cloud is the new game -- the 'no software' narrative created...
Salesforce: Benioff declared 'software is over' and the cloud is the new game -- the 'no software' narrative created the cloud CRM category
Dunford's own career: repositioned a failed 'Microsoft Access killer' (200 copies sold) as an 'embeddable SQL...
Dunford's own career: repositioned a failed 'Microsoft Access killer' (200 copies sold) as an 'embeddable SQL database' -- same product, different positioning, massive success
The Synthesis
The category-creation-vs-positioning debate has a hidden variable that determines the right answer: whether your innovation is in the problem or the solution.
If you have identified a genuinely new problem or reframed an existing problem in a way no one has before, category creation is the right move. If you have built a better solution to a well-understood problem, positioning in an existing category is almost always better.
If incumbents cannot respond to your approach without cannibalizing their own business, invest in category creation -- you have counter-positioning and the category will become your moat. If incumbents can simply copy your feature, position within the existing category and win on execution.
Category creation has historically been most effective during technology discontinuities when market rules are being rewritten. The current AI discontinuity is creating similar opportunities, but winners will identify genuinely new problems AI makes solvable -- not just rebrand existing products as AI-powered.
Which Approach Fits You?
Answer 3 questions about your situation. We'll match you to the right approach.
Is your innovation in the problem or the solution?
What are your resources for market education?
Can incumbents easily respond to your approach?
Create your own category -- frame, name, and claim it
You have identified a new problem the market does not know it has. Use the frame-it-name-it-claim-it discipline. But validate the problem with early adopters first, not just your own conviction. Category creation requires sustained investment in market education -- 76% of economics flow to the creator, but the payoff horizon is long.
Position brilliantly in an existing category
You do not need to educate the market about the problem -- you need to explain why your solution wins. Work through the five-step positioning process: competitive alternatives first, market category last. Do not waste years on category creation when you can win now. Position first, create later from a position of strength.
Counter-position against incumbents -- the category will emerge
You have something incumbents structurally cannot copy. The category creation is a strategic consequence of your positioning, not a marketing initiative. Netflix did not just create streaming -- it counter-positioned against Blockbuster with a model that could not be copied without self-harm. Focus on the structural advantage; the category follows.
Frame a world shift and let the category emerge from the story
Replace 'what category should we create?' with 'what shift in the world makes our approach inevitable?' When Salesforce declared software was over, the category became self-evident. Define the movement from old game to new game. Investors and employees want to join a movement, not evaluate a vendor.
Notable Absences
The Bottom Line
There is also a timing dimension the evidence reveals. Category creation has historically been most effective during technology discontinuities -- moments when the rules of a market are being rewritten. Salesforce launched during the shift to cloud. Netflix launched during the shift to digital delivery. The current AI discontinuity is creating similar category creation opportunities. But the companies that succeed will not be the ones who simply rebrand existing products as "AI-powered." They will be the ones who identify genuinely new problems that AI makes solvable for the first time -- and frame those problems in a way that makes the category feel inevitable.
The conditional, courtesy of Helmer: **if incumbents cannot respond to your approach without cannibalizing their own business, invest in category creation.** You have counter-positioning, and the category will become your moat. **If incumbents can simply copy your feature, position within the existing category and win on execution.** Category creation without counter-positioning is just expensive marketing with no structural advantage.
Sources
- Christopher Lochhead — "How to become a category pirate" — Sep 17, 2023
- April Dunford — "A step-by-step guide to crafting a sales pitch that wins" — Jun 9, 2022
- Hamilton Helmer — "Business strategy with Hamilton Helmer (author of 7 Powers)" — May 5, 2024
- Andy Raskin — "The power of strategic narrative" — May 28, 2023